Aphrosylus

Taking the opportunity of enforced confinement to verify some i/ds in some of my older boxes, I came across a specimen of Aphrosylus raptor dated May 2001.  There's no doubt about the i/d - 4mm, strongly spinose front coxa and trochanters, five dorsocentrals, etc.  The problrem is that I had labelled it as found in Herefordshire, hardly a location where one would find intertidal rocks.  I had put a question mark on the card at the time.  Can anyone help by asserting that this geus is not exclusively coastal?

Comments

It's an Aphrosylus alright - the massive hooked proboscis ('beak') is a give-away.  The raptor/celtiber pair are easily muddled in females, which your is, but it's one of this pair (not the tiny ferox or mitis). I gave a new key to both sexes in E&D Newsletter No 22, 7-8 (2017) (all newsletters are now downloadable from this site).  It's extremely unlikely to be in Herefordshire - all the record in the E&D scheme for all Aphrosylus (except one of my own for mitis that I don't believe!) are coastal.  Ray Poulding showed that celtiber feed on barnacles (Poulding, R.H. 1998. The larvae of Aphrosylus celtiber Haliday (Diptera, Dolichopodidae) as predators of the littoral barnacle Chthamalus montagui Southward (Cirripedia, Chthamalidae). Dipterists Digest (Second Series) 5, 70 - 74) and it is most probably that raptor has the same biology.  Aphrosylus raptor is less widespread than celtiber (except for four scattered Scottish records and one in Kent that may be errors); it is found from Dorset to Anglesey, whereas celtiber is all round the British coast (no records for East Anglia).  This probably doesn't help you, but that's what I know about these beasts.

Apologies again for not getting the recording shceme data to the NBN, but just checking for this querie I found yet another grid-ref error (Adrian's - I cannot edit it) putting an Aphrosyus well inland. The database is full of such errors.